linux-kernel - Re: [BUG almost bisected] Splat in dequeue_rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <xhsmhle0inuze.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:03:17 +0200
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [BUG almost bisected] Splat in dequeue_rt_stack() and build error

On 26/08/24 09:31, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 01:44:35PM +0200, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> 
>> Woops...
>
> On the other hand, removing that dequeue_task() makes next-20240823
> pass light testing.
>
> I have to ask...
>
> Does it make sense for Valentin to rearrange those commits to fix
> the two build bugs and remove that dequeue_task(), all in the name of
> bisectability.  Or is there something subtle here so that only Peter
> can do this work, shoulder and all?
>

I suppose at the very least another pair of eyes on this can't hurt, let me
get untangled from some other things first and I'll take a jab at it.