[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEsxzwuUiXYKjnACAa0faBE31BfTJq-OeUvdmRELvYJY6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:30:34 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/7] vhost: Add new UAPI to support changing Kthread mode
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:09 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 2:31 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 02:21:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > What is the application visible behavior that the API use is the proxy
> > > > for?
> > >
> > > Vhost used to be created by kthreadd but some recent patches change it
> > > to behave like being froked by the owner. So the various attributes
> > > that interhit from the parent has been changed (scheduling and
> > > namespace etc).
> >
> > Well, if that breaks userspace it needs to be changed to opt into the
> > new behavior rather than requiring a flag to not break the existing
> > applications.
>
> Yes, if I was not wrong, this is something this series tries to reach.
>
> No flag means old behaviour, new flag means new behaviour.
Ok, I see. The series is trying to do the reverse.
We need to fix that.
Thanks
>
> > Assuming the change is intentional to start with.
> >
> >
>
> Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists