| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202408271011.SsRB0mow-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:54:11 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, joro@...tes.org,
will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com,
gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, jgg@...pe.ca,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, jroedel@...e.de,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain
Hi Matthew,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on s390/features]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.11-rc5 next-20240826]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Rosato/iommu-s390-Implement-blocking-domain/20240826-163744
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823203108.304054-1-mjrosato%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain
config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408271011.SsRB0mow-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 08e5a1de8227512d4774a534b91cb2353cef6284)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408271011.SsRB0mow-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408271011.SsRB0mow-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:37:
In file included from include/linux/device.h:32:
In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21:
In file included from include/linux/module.h:19:
In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/elf.h:181:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h:11:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h:18:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2228:
include/linux/vmstat.h:500:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
500 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
501 | item];
| ~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:507:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
507 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
508 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:514:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
514 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:519:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
519 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
520 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:528:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
528 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
529 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:707:2: error: member reference type 'spinlock_t' (aka 'struct spinlock') is not a pointer; did you mean to use '.'?
707 | lockdep_assert_held(zdev->dom_lock);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:285:17: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_assert_held'
285 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:252:52: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_is_held'
252 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map)
| ^
include/linux/lockdep.h:279:32: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_assert'
279 | do { WARN_ON(debug_locks && !(cond)); } while (0)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h:54:25: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON'
54 | int __ret_warn_on = !!(x); \
| ^
>> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:707:2: error: cannot take the address of an rvalue of type 'struct lockdep_map'
707 | lockdep_assert_held(zdev->dom_lock);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:285:17: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_assert_held'
285 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:252:45: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_is_held'
252 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map)
| ^
include/linux/lockdep.h:279:32: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_assert'
279 | do { WARN_ON(debug_locks && !(cond)); } while (0)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h:54:25: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON'
54 | int __ret_warn_on = !!(x); \
| ^
17 warnings and 2 errors generated.
vim +707 drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
702
703 struct zpci_iommu_ctrs *zpci_get_iommu_ctrs(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
704 {
705 struct s390_domain *s390_domain;
706
> 707 lockdep_assert_held(zdev->dom_lock);
708
709 if (zdev->s390_domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED)
710 return NULL;
711
712 s390_domain = to_s390_domain(zdev->s390_domain);
713 return &s390_domain->ctrs;
714 }
715
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists