[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240828-throwing-gigahertz-739c6e5cfe84@spud>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:43:54 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: clocks: add binding for
gated-fixed-clocks
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:14:59PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> In contrast to fixed clocks that are described as ungateable, boards
> sometimes use additional oscillators for things like PCIe reference
> clocks, that need actual supplies to get enabled and enable-gpios to be
> toggled for them to work.
>
> This adds a binding for such oscillators that are not configurable
> themself, but need to handle supplies for them to work.
>
> In schematics they often can be seen as
>
> ----------------
> Enable - | 100MHz,3.3V, | - VDD
> | 3225 |
> GND - | | - OUT
> ----------------
>
> or similar. The enable pin might be separate but can also just be tied
> to the vdd supply, hence it is optional in the binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
With Rob's fix,
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Think the current name is more clear about what this is, thanks.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists