lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8cb7488-aea2-4829-9942-dd55b127c25e@cornelisnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:06:17 -0400
From: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>
To: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@...o.com>, jgg@...pe.ca, leon@...nel.org
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RDMA/sw/rdmavt/mr: Convert to use ERR_CAST()

On 8/28/24 4:27 AM, Shen Lichuan wrote:
> As opposed to open-code, using the ERR_CAST macro clearly indicates that 
> this is a pointer to an error value and a type conversion was performed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@...o.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
> index 7a9afd5231d5..5ed5cfc2b280 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
> @@ -348,13 +348,13 @@ struct ib_mr *rvt_reg_user_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, u64 start, u64 length,
>  
>  	umem = ib_umem_get(pd->device, start, length, mr_access_flags);
>  	if (IS_ERR(umem))
> -		return (void *)umem;
> +		return ERR_CAST(umem);
>  
>  	n = ib_umem_num_pages(umem);
>  
>  	mr = __rvt_alloc_mr(n, pd);
>  	if (IS_ERR(mr)) {
> -		ret = (struct ib_mr *)mr;
> +		ret = ERR_CAST(mr);
>  		goto bail_umem;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ struct ib_mr *rvt_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_mr_type mr_type,
>  
>  	mr = __rvt_alloc_mr(max_num_sg, pd);
>  	if (IS_ERR(mr))
> -		return (struct ib_mr *)mr;
> +		return ERR_CAST(mr);
>  
>  	return &mr->ibmr;
>  }

I don't think this is really necessary. You are not making the code more
readable. It doesn't simplify things. So I'm not going to Ack it, but I won't
Nak either.

-Denny

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ