linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm: ZSWAP swap-out of mTHP folios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKEwX=OvmMHANg0xub+SHj3ycgvRRqp=UDGOG4oJs7fnsQ6rGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 10:23:46 -0700
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To: Kanchana P Sridhar <kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, hannes@...xchg.org, 
	yosryahmed@...gle.com, ryan.roberts@....com, ying.huang@...el.com, 
	21cnbao@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nanhai.zou@...el.com, 
	wajdi.k.feghali@...el.com, vinodh.gopal@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm: ZSWAP swap-out of mTHP folios

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:55 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com> wrote:
>
> better by definition... I wonder if lowering the memory limit even
> further would show positive numbers? Or

... perhaps with a workload that has less cold data? or using the
zswap shrinker to off load some of these cold objects to swap?

Food for thought :)