linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/341] 6.6.48-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYs40THj+m4hWqV3ubYBPZaWQE44SXOUYYuU1T0x6R83Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 22:59:41 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org, Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/341] 6.6.48-rc1 review

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 20:00, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 20:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.48 release.
> > There are 341 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:37:36 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.48-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> The tinyconfig builds failed for all architectures on 6.6.48-rc1.
>
> Builds
>   - clang-18-tinyconfig
>   - clang-nightly-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-13-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-8-tinyconfig

The bisection pointed to the following is the first bad commit,

bc2002c9d531dd4ad0241268c946abf074d2145d is the first bad commit
    rcu: Dump memory object info if callback function is invalid

    [ Upstream commit 2cbc482d325ee58001472c4359b311958c4efdd1 ]

- Naresh

>
> lore links:
>  - https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYuibSowhidTVByMzSRdqudz1Eg_aYBs9rVS3bYEBesiUA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> ## Build
> * kernel: 6.6.48-rc1
> * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> * git commit: 0ec2cf1e20adc2c8dcc5f58f3ebd40111c280944
> * git describe: v6.6.47-342-g0ec2cf1e20ad
> * test details:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.47-342-g0ec2cf1e20ad
>
> ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.46-68-gf44ed2948b39)
> * arm64, build
> * arm, build
> * i386, build
> * x86_64, build
>   - clang-18-tinyconfig
>   - clang-nightly-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-13-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-8-tinyconfig
>
> ## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.46-68-gf44ed2948b39)
>
> ## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.46-68-gf44ed2948b39)
>
> ## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.46-68-gf44ed2948b39)
>
> ## Test result summary
> total: 175487, pass: 153815, fail: 1637, skip: 19813, xfail: 222
>
> ## Build Summary
> * arc: 5 total, 4 passed, 1 failed
> * arm: 129 total, 125 passed, 4 failed
> * arm64: 41 total, 37 passed, 4 failed
> * i386: 28 total, 23 passed, 5 failed
> * mips: 26 total, 21 passed, 5 failed
> * parisc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
> * powerpc: 36 total, 31 passed, 5 failed
> * riscv: 19 total, 16 passed, 3 failed
> * s390: 14 total, 4 passed, 10 failed
> * sh: 10 total, 8 passed, 2 failed
> * sparc: 7 total, 5 passed, 2 failed
> * x86_64: 33 total, 29 passed, 4 failed
>
> ## Test suites summary
> * boot
> * commands
> * kselftest-arm64
> * kselftest-breakpoints
> * kselftest-capabilities
> * kselftest-cgroup
> * kselftest-clone3
> * kselftest-core
> * kselftest-cpu-hotplug
> * kselftest-cpufreq
> * kselftest-efivarfs
> * kselftest-exec
> * kselftest-filesystems
> * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
> * kselftest-filesystems-epoll
> * kselftest-firmware
> * kselftest-fpu
> * kselftest-ftrace
> * kselftest-futex
> * kselftest-gpio
> * kselftest-intel_pstate
> * kselftest-ipc
> * kselftest-kcmp
> * kselftest-livepatch
> * kselftest-membarrier
> * kselftest-memfd
> * kselftest-mincore
> * kselftest-mqueue
> * kselftest-net
> * kselftest-net-mptcp
> * kselftest-openat2
> * kselftest-ptrace
> * kselftest-rseq
> * kselftest-rtc
> * kselftest-seccomp
> * kselftest-sigaltstack
> * kselftest-size
> * kselftest-tc-testing
> * kselftest-timers
> * kselftest-tmpfs
> * kselftest-tpm2
> * kselftest-user_events
> * kselftest-vDSO
> * kselftest-x86
> * kunit
> * kvm-unit-tests
> * libgpiod
> * libhugetlbfs
> * log-parser-boot
> * log-parser-test
> * ltp-commands
> * ltp-containers
> * ltp-controllers
> * ltp-cpuhotplug
> * ltp-crypto
> * ltp-cve
> * ltp-dio
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests
> * ltp-fs
> * ltp-fs_bind
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple
> * ltp-hugetlb
> * ltp-ipc
> * ltp-math
> * ltp-mm
> * ltp-nptl
> * ltp-pty
> * ltp-sched
> * ltp-smoke
> * ltp-syscalls
> * ltp-tracing
> * perf
> * rcutorture
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org