[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zs9qbsC_mjWkoQr3@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:20:30 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Move walk_slot_rmaps() up near for_each_slot_rmap_range()
On Fri, Aug 09, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Move walk_slot_rmaps() and friends up near for_each_slot_rmap_range() so
> that the walkers can be used to handle mmu_notifier invalidations, and so
> that similar function has some amount of locality in code.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 901be9e420a4..676cb7dfcbf9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -1534,6 +1534,60 @@ static void slot_rmap_walk_next(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator)
> slot_rmap_walk_okay(_iter_); \
> slot_rmap_walk_next(_iter_))
>
> +
Doh, extra newline here.
> +/* The return value indicates if tlb flush on all vcpus is needed. */
> +typedef bool (*slot_rmaps_handler) (struct kvm *kvm,
> + struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
> + const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists