lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240828143900.d0fe36a6c05982159607fd3d@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 14:39:00 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: muchun.song@...ux.dev, dave@...olabs.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: sort out global lock annotations

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:02:39 +0200 Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com> wrote:

> > We'd need a new DEFINE_SPINLOCK_ALIGNED() or something.
> >
> > Ho hum, I'll fix.
> 
> that would be a nice addition
> 
> so as is this triviality grew to 3 patches which I consider rather
> extreme, and the middle one breaks the build
> 
> In the vfs land this would get squashed into one commit with a
> maintainer note that some tweaking was performed, which I would
> suggest here

Yep.  In mm land they get piled up as base+fix+fix-2 etc and then
squashed before being moved into mm.git's non-rebasing mm-stable
branch.

> alternatively, given the trivial nature of the entire thing, if you
> add DEFINE_SPINLOCK_ALIGNED and do the annotation tweak, you may as
> well commit this as your own patch. I don't need any credit

eh, it's very minor.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ