[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19c7e2b8-7f74-4138-b366-758b65da998b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 06:35:47 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@...lingroup.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
Krzysztof DrobiĆski <k.drobinski@...lintechnologies.com>,
Pawel Lenkow <p.lenkow@...lintechnologies.com>,
Kirill Yatsenko <kirill.yatsenko@...lingroup.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] serial: sc16is7xx: cosmetic cleanup
On 27. 08. 24, 17:38, Lech Perczak wrote:
> Only the single expansion of GENMASK proves very hard to analyze in the
> diff - so I double-checked with a calculator,
> though all BIT() expansions do match, as does the updated definition.
> of SC16IS7XX_LSR_BRK_ERROR_MASK.
You can diff also the generated .o fed through objdump -d (generated .s
usually contains line numbers).
regards,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists