lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gtoz6fzmukti7mbdihsw5ycltoozhrxgery536rh6dgpcqoru2@gd27iemigqae>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 08:23:27 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Lijuan Gao <quic_lijuang@...cinc.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, kernel@...cinc.com, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for QCS615 DTSI

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:02:15AM +0800, Lijuan Gao wrote:
> Add initial DTSI for QCS615 SoC. It includes base description
> of CPUs, interrupt-controller and cpu idle on Qualcomm QCS615
> platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lijuan Gao <quic_lijuang@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 449 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 449 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cf7aaa7f6131
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,449 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> +/ {
> +	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> +

No need for blank line.

> +	#address-cells = <2>;
> +	#size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +	chosen { };

Drop, redundant.

> +
> +	clocks {
> +		xo_board: xo-board {

xo-clk? xo-board-clk?

But if board, this does not sound like part of SoC. See other files how
they do it.


> +			compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +			clock-frequency = <38400000>;
> +			#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		};
> +
> +		sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
> +			compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +			clock-frequency = <32000>;
> +			#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	cpus {
> +		#address-cells = <2>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +		CPU0: cpu@0 {

labels are lowercase.

> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> +			enable-method = "psci";
> +			power-domains = <&CPU_PD0>;
> +			power-domain-names = "psci";
> +			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> +			#cooling-cells = <2>;
> +
> +			L2_0: l2-cache {

lowercase

> +			      compatible = "cache";
> +			      cache-level = <2>;
> +			      cache-unified;
> +			      next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ