[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9180e80b-f464-4a84-8c58-35383beec637@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:08:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>, marcan@...can.st,
sven@...npeter.dev, alyssa@...enzweig.io, robh@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
krzk+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, dsimic@...jaro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nick@...das.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/2] arm64: dts: apple: add "brcm,bcm4329-fmac"
fallback compatible
On 28/08/2024 08:13, Jacobe Zang wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/8/28 13:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/08/2024 05:39, Jacobe Zang wrote:
>>> Broadcom driver need to check "brcm,bcm4329-fmac" compatible. Before
>>
>> What for?
>>
>
> It matches the changes in the other series that I sent.
Commit msg did not explain this at all. Anyway, then bindings should
provide proper rationale without referring to "driver" as the reason.
>
>>> PCIe devices used PCI ID as base compabile so add it as fallback
>>> compatible to pass the check.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103-jxxx.dtsi | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8112-j413.dts | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8112-j493.dts | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103-jxxx.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103-jxxx.dtsi
>>> index 5988a4eb6efaa..4b021626d4692 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103-jxxx.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103-jxxx.dtsi
>>> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ hpm1: usb-pd@3f {
>>> &port00 {
>>> bus-range = <1 1>;
>>> wifi0: network@0,0 {
>>> - compatible = "pci14e4,4425";
>>> + compatible = "pci14e4,4425", "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
>>
>> So devices are not compatible, but your argument is that driver needs to
>> do something here? That's not enough.
>>
> Before this change, the check of "brcm,bcm4329-fmac" compatible is set
> at the end of probe function for SDIO devices which need IRQ. But after
> this change I set it to the top as the first check. So I add this
> fallback compatible to the Apple's DTS.
You are not listening, I think, and still keep talking about driver. It
has nothing to do. Fix your driver.
>
> Oh..I got what you mean. Maybe my commit message is not clearly. It is
> no need to mention driver in it. Because the intent of adding the
> "brcm,bcm4329-fmac" compatible is to conform to the bindings.
Explain the hardware, not the driver. DTS represents hardware, not drivers.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists