[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40421bdb-4573-4768-8d6d-39b0d0df9260@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 20:53:44 +0800
From: Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
CC: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba
<dsterba@...e.com>, <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] btrfs: Fix reversed condition in
copy_inline_to_page()
Hi Dan,
在 2024/8/27 18:21, Dan Carpenter 写道:
> This if statement is reversed leading to locking issues.
>
> Fixes: 8e603cfe05f0 ("btrfs: convert copy_inline_to_page() to use folio")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> This patch is obviously correct but it's from static analysis so additional
> testing would be good as well.
>
> fs/btrfs/reflink.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> index 1681d63f03dd..f0824c948cb7 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int copy_inline_to_page(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
> btrfs_folio_clear_checked(fs_info, folio, file_offset, block_size);
> btrfs_folio_set_dirty(fs_info, folio, file_offset, block_size);
> out_unlock:
> - if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
> + if (!IS_ERR(folio)) {
This is a mistake caused by my carelessness,thank you for the patch
> folio_unlock(folio);
> folio_put(folio);
> }
Can I merge your patch into my patchset and add you as a co-author?
Thanks,
Li Zetao.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists