[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240828125153.GF29862@gate.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 07:51:53 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
shuah <shuah@...nel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] vdso: Avoid call to memset() by getrandom
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 02:26:08PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 2:24 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024, at 11:18, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 05:53:30PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:08:19AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Is there a compiler flag that could be used to disable the generation of calls
> > >> > to memset?
> > >>
> > >> -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns . But, as always, read up on it, see
> > >> what it actually does (and how it avoids your problem, and mostly: learn
> > >> what the actual problem *was*!)
> > >
> > > This might help with various loops, but it doesn't help with the matter
> > > that this patch fixes, which is struct initialization. I just tried it
> > > with the arm64 patch to no avail.
> >
> > Maybe -ffreestanding can help here? That should cause the vdso to be built
> > with the assumption that there is no libc, so it would neither add nor
> > remove standard library calls. Not sure if that causes other problems,
> > e.g. if the calling conventions are different.
>
> >From https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701:
>
> | You need -ffreestanding but that is documented to emit memset and
> memcpy still.
Yeah.
'-nostdlib'
Do not use the standard system startup files or libraries when
linking.
This won't help a bit, the compiler will still optimise your
initialisation loop to a memset() call, it just won't link to libgcc.a
and crt*.o and its ilk (which is not where mem* are implemented in the
first place!)
Segher
Powered by blists - more mailing lists