lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2576985.vzjCzTo3RI@diego>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:42:35 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Jonathan Liu <net147@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@...xa.com>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
 Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable RK809 audio codec for Radxa ROCK
 4C+

Hi Jonathan,

Am Mittwoch, 28. August 2024, 15:24:56 CEST schrieb Jonathan Liu:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 22:59, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 28. August 2024, 09:47:53 CEST schrieb Jonathan Liu:
> > > This adds the necessary device tree changes to enable analog audio
> > > output for the 3.5 mm TRS headphone jack on the Radxa ROCK 4C+ with
> > > its RK809 audio codec.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@...il.com>
> >
> > as it looks like you have one of those boards, could I possibly as you
> > to take a look at the vdd_cpu_b and vdd_gpu nodes?
> >
> > I see (and devicetree check reports it too) a pinctrl-0 for the vsel-gpio
> > without accompanying pinctrl-names.
> >
> > Could you check if things fail if you either add pinctrl-names or remove
> > the pinctrl-0 entry?
> 
> I tried both but neither resulted in any change to the warnings in dtbs_check.
> Reverting my change also results in the same warnings so I don't think
> it is related to my change.

I was more aiming at a functional test on the board :-) .

You are correct in that this is not related to your change, I was just
seeing someone with the hardware.

I.e. while running dtbs check here I saw those regulator nodes
and didn't want to change stuff without being able to test them.

Heiko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ