linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Allow complete locally if capacities are different

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <03e92755-2011-4c43-8a1c-f1ad9a1382eb@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:47:17 -0400
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>,
 Manish Pandey <quic_mapa@...cinc.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com, quic_bhaskarv@...cinc.com,
 quic_narepall@...cinc.com, quic_rampraka@...cinc.com, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
 quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com, Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
 Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Allow complete locally if capacities are
 different

On 8/28/24 8:26 AM, Christian Loehle wrote:
> On 8/28/24 13:13, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> I think that the following is missing from the above description:
>> - Mentioning that this is for an unusual interrupt routing technology
>>    (SoC sends the interrupt to another CPU core than what has been
>>     specified in the smp_affinity mask).
> 
> FWIW on !mcq that doesn't have to be the case.

Hmm ... is there any x86 architecture that ignores the smp_affinity
mask? I have not yet encountered an x86 system that does not respect
the smp_affinity mask.

Thanks,

Bart.