[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83dce3bb-28c6-4021-a343-cff2410a463f@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:02:29 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, shenjian15@...wei.com,
wangpeiyang1@...wei.com, liuyonglong@...wei.com,
chenhao418@...wei.com, sudongming1@...wei.com,
xujunsheng@...wei.com, shiyongbang@...wei.com, libaihan@...wei.com,
jdamato@...tly.com, horms@...nel.org, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, salil.mehta@...wei.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 net-next 06/11] net: hibmcge: Implement
.ndo_start_xmit function
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:32:33AM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:
>
> on 2024/8/29 9:41, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 21:14:50 +0800 Jijie Shao wrote:
> > > @@ -111,6 +135,14 @@ static int hbg_init(struct hbg_priv *priv)
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > > + ret = hbg_txrx_init(priv);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > You allocate buffers on the probe path?
> > The queues and all the memory will be sitting allocated but unused if
> > admin does ip link set dev $eth0 down?
>
> The network port has only one queue and
> the TX queue depth is 64, RX queue depth is 127.
> so it doesn't take up much memory.
>
> Also, I plan to add the self_test feature in a future patch.
> If I don't allocate buffers on the probe path,
> I won't be able to do a loopback test if the network port goes down unexpectedly.
When you come to implement ethtool --set-ring, you will need to
allocate and free the ring buffers outside of probe.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists