linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 14/17] fs/proc/task_mmu: remove per-page mapcount dependency for PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE (CONFIG_NO_PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240829165627.2256514-15-david@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 18:56:17 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 14/17] fs/proc/task_mmu: remove per-page mapcount dependency for PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT)

Let's implement an alternative when per-page mapcounts in large folios are
no longer maintained -- soon with CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT.

PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE will now be set if folio_likely_mapped_shared() is
true -- when the folio is considered "mapped shared", including when
it once was "mapped shared" but no longer is, as documented.

This might result in and under-indication of "exclusively mapped", which
is considered better than over-indicating it: under-estimating the USS
(Unique Set Size) is better than over-estimating it.

As an alternative, we could simply remove that flag with
CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT completely, but there might be value to it. So,
let's keep it like that and document the behavior.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst |  9 +++++++++
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c                       | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst
index 49590306c61a0..131c86574c39a 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ There are four components to pagemap:
    precisely which pages are mapped (or in swap) and comparing mapped
    pages between processes.
 
+   Note that in some kernel configurations, all pages part of a larger
+   allocation (e.g., THP) might be considered "mapped shared" if the large
+   allocation is considered "mapped shared": if not all pages are exclusive to
+   the same process. Further, some kernel configurations might consider larger
+   allocations "mapped shared", if they were at one point considered
+   "mapped shared", even if they would now be considered "exclusively mapped".
+   Consequently, in these kernel configurations, bit 56 might be set although
+   the page is actually "exclusively mapped"
+
    Efficient users of this interface will use ``/proc/pid/maps`` to
    determine which areas of memory are actually mapped and llseek to
    skip over unmapped regions.
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 5f171ad7b436b..f35a63c4b7c7a 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -29,6 +29,18 @@
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT
+static bool __folio_page_mapped_exclusively(struct folio *folio, struct page *page)
+{
+	return folio_precise_page_mapcount(folio, page) == 1;
+}
+#else /* !CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT */
+static bool __folio_page_mapped_exclusively(struct folio *folio, struct page *page)
+{
+	return !folio_likely_mapped_shared(folio);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT */
+
 #define SEQ_PUT_DEC(str, val) \
 		seq_put_decimal_ull_width(m, str, (val) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10), 8)
 void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
@@ -1746,7 +1758,7 @@ static pagemap_entry_t pte_to_pagemap_entry(struct pagemapread *pm,
 		if (!folio_test_anon(folio))
 			flags |= PM_FILE;
 		if ((flags & PM_PRESENT) &&
-		    folio_precise_page_mapcount(folio, page) == 1)
+		    __folio_page_mapped_exclusively(folio, page))
 			flags |= PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE;
 	}
 	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SOFTDIRTY)
@@ -1821,7 +1833,7 @@ static int pagemap_pmd_range(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 			pagemap_entry_t pme;
 
 			if (folio && (flags & PM_PRESENT) &&
-			    folio_precise_page_mapcount(folio, page + idx) == 1)
+			    __folio_page_mapped_exclusively(folio, page))
 				cur_flags |= PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE;
 
 			pme = make_pme(frame, cur_flags);
-- 
2.46.0