[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALNs47uOhuNCj+LjD66AE5DSJ0DdEv4keJcgbmPaEAEFScWUMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:41:12 -0500
From: Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rust: Provide correct provenance when constructing THIS_MODULE
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 1:02 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Currently while defining `THIS_MODULE` symbol in `module!()`, the
> pointer used to contruct `ThisModule` is derived from an immutable
> reference of `__this_module`, which means the pointer doesn't have
> the provenance for writting, and that means any write to that pointer
> is UB regardless of data races or not. However, the usage of
> `THIS_MODULE` includes passing this pointer to functions that may write
> to it (probably in unsafe code), and this will create soundness issues.
>
> One way to fix this is using `addr_of_mut!()` but that requires the
> unstable feature "const_mut_refs". So instead of `addr_of_mut()!`,
> an extern static `Opaque` is used here: since `Opaque<T>` is transparent
> to `T`, an extern static `Opaque` will just wrap the C symbol (defined
> in a C compile unit) in an `Opaque`, which provides a pointer with
> writable provenance via `Opaque::get()`. This fix the potential UBs
> because of pointer provenance unmatched.
>
> Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>
Thanks for the fix!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists