[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240829043846.GC4229@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 21:38:46 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Radu Rendec <rrendec@...hat.com>,
Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@....com>, Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/cacheinfo: Clean out init_cache_level()
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 05:01:38PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 27.08.24 г. 8:16 ч., Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > init_cache_level() no longer has a purpose on x86. It no longer needs to
> > set num_leaves, and it never had to set num_levels, which was unnecessary
> > on x86.
> >
> > Replace it with "return 0" simply to override the weak function, which
> > would return an error.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists