linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv: Add stimecmp save and restore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240829-fb7bda6b46302b65b2f89d20@orel>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:59:04 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Nick Hu <nick.hu@...ive.com>
Cc: greentime.hu@...ive.com, zong.li@...ive.com, 
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, 
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, 
	Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>, Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv: Add stimecmp save and restore

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:38:59AM GMT, Nick Hu wrote:
> If the HW support the SSTC extension, we should save and restore the
> stimecmp register while cpu non retention suspend.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Hu <nick.hu@...ive.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h |  4 ++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c      | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h
> index 4ffb022b097f..ffaac2efabb5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ struct suspend_context {
>  	unsigned long envcfg;
>  	unsigned long tvec;
>  	unsigned long ie;
> +#if __riscv_xlen < 64
> +	unsigned long stimecmph;
> +#endif

I'm not sure the reduction in struct size is worth the #ifdeffery. If we
just always add stimecmph, then we can also change the #ifdef's below to
if's, i.e. if (__riscv_xlen < 64), which should still remove the code from
64-bit builds.

Or maybe we need something like

#if __riscv_xlen < 64
#define csrh_write(r, v) csr_write(r, v)
#else
#define csrh_write(r, v)
#endif

in asm/csr.h and then use it for all the *h csrs, but keep the #if in
the struct.

Thanks,
drew

> +	unsigned long stimecmp;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>  	unsigned long satp;
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c
> index c8cec0cc5833..3afd86e1abf7 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ void suspend_save_csrs(struct suspend_context *context)
>  	context->tvec = csr_read(CSR_TVEC);
>  	context->ie = csr_read(CSR_IE);
>  
> +	if (riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC)) {
> +		context->stimecmp = csr_read(CSR_STIMECMP);
> +#if __riscv_xlen < 64
> +		context->stimecmph = csr_read(CSR_STIMECMPH);
> +#endif
> +	}
>  	/*
>  	 * No need to save/restore IP CSR (i.e. MIP or SIP) because:
>  	 *
> @@ -42,6 +48,13 @@ void suspend_restore_csrs(struct suspend_context *context)
>  	csr_write(CSR_TVEC, context->tvec);
>  	csr_write(CSR_IE, context->ie);
>  
> +	if (riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC)) {
> +		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, context->stimecmp);
> +#if __riscv_xlen < 64
> +		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMPH, context->stimecmph);
> +#endif
> +	}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>  	csr_write(CSR_SATP, context->satp);
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>