[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87475131-856C-44DC-A27A-84648294F094@alien8.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:34:49 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org
CC: hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com, michael.roth@....com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Fix host kdump support for SNP
On August 27, 2024 10:38:04 PM GMT+02:00, Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com> wrote:
>From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>
>
>With active SNP VMs, SNP_SHUTDOWN_EX invoked during panic notifiers causes
>crashkernel boot failure with the following signature:
Why would SNP_SHUTDOWN be allowed *at all* if there are active SNP guests and there's potential to lose guest data in the process?!
I don't think you want to be on the receiving end of those customer support calls at your cloud provider...
--
Sent from a small device: formatting sucks and brevity is inevitable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists