[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtBSkWzU9bYxtOPG@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:50:57 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] pinctrl: intel: Add __intel_gpio_get_direction()
helper
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 01:49:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 07:46:53AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 09:38:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > > + * enum - possible pad physical configurations
> > > + *
> >
> > Start with capital letter as others:
> >
> > enum - Possible..
>
> Fixed!
>
> > Also I think we should follow the structs and drop the empty line here
> > (well and for other enums, I don't know how they got there ;-) but it
> > looks better without.
>
> We have the other enum with a blank line. Perhaps removing them in a separate
> patch?
Or I can do it "while at it", it seems to be quite small and likely never
conflicting change...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists