linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] netcons: Add udp send fail statistics to netconsole

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZtHTSexXueMjYGh/@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 07:12:25 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Maksym Kutsevol <max@...sevol.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] netcons: Add udp send fail statistics to
 netconsole

Hello Maksym,

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 08:58:12AM -0400, Maksym Kutsevol wrote:

> > I am not sure this if/else/endif is the best way. I am wondering if
> > something like this would make the code simpler (uncompiled/untested):

> Two calls in two different places to netpoll_send_udp bothers you or
> the way it has to distinct cases for enabled/disabled and you prefer to
> have it as added steps for the case when it's enabled?

I would say both. I try to reduce as much as possible the number of
similar calls and #else(s) is the goal.

At the same time, I admit it is easier said than done, and Jakub is
usually the one that helps me to reach the last mile.