[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtHjejGdhZnZu4WQ@zx2c4.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 17:21:30 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] aarch64: vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 04:19:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 08:17:14PM +0000, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> > Hook up the generic vDSO implementation to the aarch64 vDSO data page.
> > The _vdso_rng_data required data is placed within the _vdso_data vvar
> > page, by using a offset larger than the vdso_data.
>
> This exposes some preexisting compiler warnings in the getrandom test
> when built with clang:
>
> vdso_test_getrandom.c:145:40: warning: omitting the parameter name in a function definition is a C23 extension [-Wc23-extensions]
> 145 | static void *test_vdso_getrandom(void *)
> | ^
> vdso_test_getrandom.c:155:40: warning: omitting the parameter name in a function definition is a C23 extension [-Wc23-extensions]
> 155 | static void *test_libc_getrandom(void *)
> | ^
> vdso_test_getrandom.c:165:43: warning: omitting the parameter name in a function definition is a C23 extension [-Wc23-extensions]
> 165 | static void *test_syscall_getrandom(void *)
> | ^
>
> which it'd be good to get fixed before merging.
That's my bug. I'll fix that up in the tree and CC you on it. Thanks for
pointing it out.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists