lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABi2SkUtCqLj49rpm4+vB1+SqaT9YAuAVwVj6PpaDbkJStZSVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:52:56 -0700
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
To: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, 
	rientjes@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] selftests/mm: mseal_test add more tests for mmap

Hi Pedro

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 5:57 AM Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:43:51PM GMT, jeffxu@...omium.org wrote:
> > From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
> >
> > Add sealing test to cover mmap for
> > Expand/shrink across vmas.
> > Reuse the same address in !MAP_FIXED case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
> > index ae06c354220d..d83538039e76 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
> > @@ -2222,6 +2222,122 @@ static void test_munmap_free_multiple_ranges(bool seal)
> >       REPORT_TEST_PASS();
> >  }
> >
> > +static void test_seal_mmap_expand_seal_middle(bool seal)
> > +{
> > +     void *ptr;
> > +     unsigned long page_size = getpagesize();
> > +     unsigned long size = 12 * page_size;
> > +     int ret;
> > +     void *ret2;
> > +     int prot;
> > +
> > +     setup_single_address(size, &ptr);
> > +     FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ptr != (void *)-1);
> > +     /* ummap last 4 pages. */
> > +     ret = sys_munmap(ptr + 8 * page_size, 4 * page_size);
> > +     FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(!ret);
> > +
> > +     size = get_vma_size(ptr, &prot);
> > +     FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(size == 8 * page_size);
> > +     FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(prot == 0x4);
> > +
> > +     if (seal) {
> > +             ret = sys_mseal(ptr + 4 * page_size, 4 * page_size);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(!ret);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /* use mmap to expand. */
> > +     ret2 = mmap(ptr, 12 * page_size, PROT_READ,
> > +                     MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_FIXED, -1, 0);
>
> This is not expansion, but overwriting. Expansion is allowed through an adjacent mmap + mseal (which will merge the two VMAs).

The mmap is trying to expand the address range beginning from ptr
(size 8 * page_size) to 12 * page_size. This is overwrite + expansion.

>
> > +     if (seal) {
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ret2 == MAP_FAILED);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(errno == EPERM);
> > +
> > +             size = get_vma_size(ptr, &prot);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(size == 4 * page_size);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(prot == 0x4);
> > +
> > +             size = get_vma_size(ptr + 4 * page_size, &prot);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(size == 4 * page_size);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(prot == 0x4);
> > +     } else
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ret2 == ptr);
> > +
> > +     REPORT_TEST_PASS();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_seal_mmap_shrink_seal_middle(bool seal)
> > +{
> > +     void *ptr;
> > +     unsigned long page_size = getpagesize();
> > +     unsigned long size = 12 * page_size;
> > +     int ret;
> > +     void *ret2;
> > +     int prot;
> > +
> > +     setup_single_address(size, &ptr);
> > +     FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ptr != (void *)-1);
> > +
> > +     if (seal) {
> > +             ret = sys_mseal(ptr + 4 * page_size, 4 * page_size);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(!ret);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /* use mmap to shrink. */
> > +     ret2 = mmap(ptr, 7 * page_size, PROT_READ,
> > +                     MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_FIXED, -1, 0);
>
> This is also a partial overwrite.
The mmap is trying to shrink the address range beginning from ptr
(size 12 * page_size) to 8 * page_size. This is overwrite + shrink.

>
> > +     if (seal) {
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ret2 == MAP_FAILED);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(errno == EPERM);
> > +
> > +             size = get_vma_size(ptr, &prot);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(size == 4 * page_size);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(prot == 0x4);
> > +
> > +             size = get_vma_size(ptr + 4 * page_size, &prot);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(size == 4 * page_size);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(prot == 0x4);
> > +
> > +             size = get_vma_size(ptr + 4 * page_size, &prot);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(size == 4 * page_size);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(prot == 0x4);
> > +     } else
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ret2 == ptr);
> > +
> > +     REPORT_TEST_PASS();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_seal_mmap_reuse_addr(bool seal)
> > +{
> > +     void *ptr;
> > +     unsigned long page_size = getpagesize();
> > +     unsigned long size = page_size;
> > +     int ret;
> > +     void *ret2;
> > +     int prot;
> > +
> > +     setup_single_address(size, &ptr);
> > +     FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ptr != (void *)-1);
> > +
> > +     if (seal) {
> > +             ret = sys_mseal(ptr, size);
> > +             FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(!ret);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /* use mmap to change protection. */
> > +     ret2 = mmap(ptr, size, PROT_NONE,
> > +                     MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
> > +
>
> This is also an overwrite. You're semantically testing the same thing, and testing the same regions of code.

This is not overwriting. MAP_FIXED is not used.

-Jeff

> These 3 tests are all kind of the same thing.
>
> --
> Pedro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ