[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <403cc76f-7ba4-412b-9784-af6a6e14cf4a@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 19:53:38 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Chen Yufan <chenyufan@...o.com>, Emilio López
<emilio@...pez.com.ar>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clk: sunxi: sun9i-mmc: Use dev_err_probe() to simplfy
code
On 30/08/2024 09:27, Chen Yufan wrote:
> Use dev_err_probe() can make code a bit simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yufan <chenyufan@...o.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c
> index 91074017c04f..e6b62e421936 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c
> @@ -134,10 +134,8 @@ static int sun9i_a80_mmc_config_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> ret = reset_control_deassert(data->reset);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Reset deassert err %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Reset deassert err %d\n");
This is ridiculous.
You change something which cannot defer, while leaving other places
which actually can defer and could benefit.
Stop spamming with such low quality patches.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists