linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 04/10] mm: remove duplicated open-coded VMA policy check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0dbff286d9c4988333bc6f4ff3734cb95dd5410a.1725040657.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 19:10:16 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/10] mm: remove duplicated open-coded VMA policy check

Both can_vma_merge_before() and can_vma_merge_after() are invoked after
checking for compatible VMA NUMA policy, we can simply move this to
is_mergeable_vma() and abstract this altogether.

In mmap_region() we set vmg->policy to NULL, so the policy comparisons
checked in can_vma_merge_before() and can_vma_merge_after() are exactly
equivalent to !vma_policy(vmg.next) and !vma_policy(vmg.prev).

Equally, in do_brk_flags(), vmg->policy is NULL, so the
can_vma_merge_after() is checking !vma_policy(vma), as we set vmg.prev to
vma.

In vma_merge(), we compare prev and next policies with vmg->policy before
checking can_vma_merge_after() and can_vma_merge_before() respectively,
which this patch causes to be checked in precisely the same way.

This therefore maintains precisely the same logic as before, only now
abstracted into is_mergeable_vma().

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
---
 mm/mmap.c | 8 +++-----
 mm/vma.c  | 9 ++++-----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index ca9c6939638b..3af8459e4e88 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -1423,8 +1423,7 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
 
 	/* Attempt to expand an old mapping */
 	/* Check next */
-	if (next && next->vm_start == end && !vma_policy(next) &&
-	    can_vma_merge_before(&vmg)) {
+	if (next && next->vm_start == end && can_vma_merge_before(&vmg)) {
 		merge_end = next->vm_end;
 		vma = next;
 		vmg.pgoff = next->vm_pgoff - pglen;
@@ -1438,8 +1437,7 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
 	}
 
 	/* Check prev */
-	if (prev && prev->vm_end == addr && !vma_policy(prev) &&
-	    can_vma_merge_after(&vmg)) {
+	if (prev && prev->vm_end == addr && can_vma_merge_after(&vmg)) {
 		merge_start = prev->vm_start;
 		vma = prev;
 		vmg.pgoff = prev->vm_pgoff;
@@ -1779,7 +1777,7 @@ static int do_brk_flags(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	 * Expand the existing vma if possible; Note that singular lists do not
 	 * occur after forking, so the expand will only happen on new VMAs.
 	 */
-	if (vma && vma->vm_end == addr && !vma_policy(vma)) {
+	if (vma && vma->vm_end == addr) {
 		VMG_STATE(vmg, mm, vmi, addr, addr + len, flags, PHYS_PFN(addr));
 
 		vmg.prev = vma;
diff --git a/mm/vma.c b/mm/vma.c
index 6be645240f07..3284bb778c3d 100644
--- a/mm/vma.c
+++ b/mm/vma.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ static inline bool is_mergeable_vma(struct vma_merge_struct *vmg, bool merge_nex
 	 */
 	bool may_remove_vma = merge_next;
 
+	if (!mpol_equal(vmg->policy, vma_policy(vma)))
+		return false;
 	/*
 	 * VM_SOFTDIRTY should not prevent from VMA merging, if we
 	 * match the flags but dirty bit -- the caller should mark
@@ -1053,17 +1055,14 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_merge_struct *vmg)
 		vma_pgoff = prev->vm_pgoff;
 
 		/* Can we merge the predecessor? */
-		if (addr == prev->vm_end && mpol_equal(vma_policy(prev), vmg->policy)
-		    && can_vma_merge_after(vmg)) {
-
+		if (addr == prev->vm_end && can_vma_merge_after(vmg)) {
 			merge_prev = true;
 			vma_prev(vmg->vmi);
 		}
 	}
 
 	/* Can we merge the successor? */
-	if (next && mpol_equal(vmg->policy, vma_policy(next)) &&
-	    can_vma_merge_before(vmg)) {
+	if (next && can_vma_merge_before(vmg)) {
 		merge_next = true;
 	}
 
-- 
2.46.0