[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef38cd36-3e15-4608-8b72-87cf7621cce6@csgroup.eu>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 20:52:37 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Bill Wendling
<morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO
implementation on PPC32
Le 30/08/2024 à 18:17, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ ifeq ($(uname_M),x86_64)
>> TEST_GEN_PROGS += vdso_test_getrandom
>> TEST_GEN_PROGS += vdso_test_chacha
>> endif
>> +ifeq ($(ARCH),powerpc)
>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS += vdso_test_getrandom
>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS += vdso_test_chacha
>> +endif
>
> FYI, as of [1], you should now be able to add powerpc to the filter list
> instead of having to duplicate a new stanza:
>
> [1] https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fcrng%2Frandom.git%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3Dbbaae98172ed284fc0d5d39cc0d68f5d06164f06&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C4f51736c027a44cc7df908dcc90f46d6%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638606314665557021%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UtLdKTuEaZVhsguKa7kX1TBJ%2BvvQtl7DmU9hSBeThWo%3D&reserved=0
I'm a bit sceptic with that commit. IIUC you are changing the meaning of
$ARCH. How does that fit with the $ARCH we give when we cross-build or
with the ARCH which is set by the top-level Makefile in
tools/testing/selftests ?
Also, wouldn't there be a way to use scripts/subarch.include instead of
opencoding ?
Afterall, would it be a problem to build it even for i386 ? It should
now be ignored anyway with your new commit f78280b1a3ce ("selftests:
vDSO: skip getrandom test if architecture is unsupported")
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists