[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtIZg4Jy31GON1zw@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 22:12:03 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yang Ruibin <11162571@...o.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: spi: Insert the missing pci_dev_put()before
return
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:55:06AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 5:35 AM Yang Ruibin <11162571@...o.com> wrote:
> > Increase the reference count by calling pci_get_slot(), and remember to
> > decrement the reference count by calling pci_dev_put().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Ruibin <11162571@...o.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 8a0ec8c2d736961f ("spi:
> Insert the missing pci_dev_put()before return") in spi/for-next.
Which should be reverted.
Who is going to send one?
I also have one revert for double applied spi-ppc44x commit.
But Mark haven't replied if I need to send a v2 of that as it has Subject and
first line of the commit message generated by `git revert` without editing.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists