[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtIqKjdM6Cm8rbRw@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 21:23:06 +0100
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, amritha.nambiar@...el.com,
sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, sdf@...ichev.me, bjorn@...osinc.com,
hch@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, skhawaja@...gle.com,
Martin Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: napi: Make napi_defer_hard_irqs
per-NAPI
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 01:21:12PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 10:14:41 +0100 Joe Damato wrote:
> > Otherwise: I'll make them static inlines as you suggested.
> >
> > Let me know if you have a preference here because I am neutral.
>
> No strong preference either, static inlines seem like a good
> middle ground :)
Ack. Already queued up in my v2 branch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists