linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240830094549.1c513ba2@xps-13>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:45:49 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <michal.simek@....com>,
 <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>, <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
 <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <khilman@...libre.com>,
 <jbrunet@...libre.com>, <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 <heiko@...ech.de>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <wens@...e.org>,
 <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, <samuel@...lland.org>, <kees@...nel.org>,
 <gustavoars@...nel.org>, <linux@...blig.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
 <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <erick.archer@....com>,
 <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, <val@...kett.cool>,
 <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use
 for_each_child_of_node_scoped()

Jinjie,

ruanjinjie@...wei.com wrote on Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:34:38 +0800:

> On 2024/8/26 20:49, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > krzk@...nel.org wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:19:07 +0200:
> >   
> >> On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >>> Hi Jinjie,
> >>>
> >>> ruanjinjie@...wei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:
> >>>     
> >>>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> >>>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.    
> >>>
> >>> Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?    
> >>
> >> You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split
> >> between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend.  
> > 
> > Ok. Makes sense, and the patchset looks fine.  
> 
> Hi, Miquel,
> 
> Could this series be merged, thank you!

You've sent this series on Monday, we are Friday. I answered a first
time within 5h and reviewed it within 8h. So that means I will take the
patchset:
- when I have the time to do so
- after several days to give a chance to other to review it as well
- unless someone speaks up against it in a "reasonable time frame"
- unless a robot that parses the patches on the mailing lists complains
  about it (usually within few days, up to a week).

In general, a good rule of thumb is to refrain yourself from pinging
within 2 weeks for non-urgent matters like this series.

Thanks,
Miquèl