linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] Re: [btrfs?] kernel BUG in btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0000000000001806c20620e3205f@google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 02:22:08 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+4704b3cc972bd76024f1@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] Re: [btrfs?] kernel BUG in btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging

For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org.

***

Subject: Re: [btrfs?] kernel BUG in btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging
Author: lizhi.xu@...driver.com

or i_mmap_lock ?

#syz test

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index 82a68394a89c..d0187e1fb941 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,8 @@ void btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 {
 	struct rb_node *n;
 
-	ASSERT(inode_is_locked(&inode->vfs_inode));
+	ASSERT(inode_is_locked(&inode->vfs_inode) ||
+	       rwsem_is_locked(&inode->i_mmap_lock));
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
 	for (n = rb_first(&inode->ordered_tree); n; n = rb_next(n)) {