linux-kernel - [PATCH 06/11] sched_ext: Reorder args for consume_local/remote

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240830110415.116090-7-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 01:03:50 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: void@...ifault.com
Cc: kernel-team@...a.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] sched_ext: Reorder args for consume_local/remote_task()

Reorder args for consistency in the order of:

  current_rq, p, src_[rq|dsq], dst_[rq|dsq].

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/ext.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index add267f31396..620cc0586c4b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -2139,8 +2139,8 @@ static void move_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
 
 #endif	/* CONFIG_SMP */
 
-static void consume_local_task(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,
-			       struct task_struct *p)
+static void consume_local_task(struct task_struct *p,
+			       struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct rq *rq)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held(&dsq->lock);	/* released on return */
 
@@ -2249,8 +2249,8 @@ static bool unlink_dsq_and_lock_task_rq(struct task_struct *p,
 		!WARN_ON_ONCE(task_rq != task_rq(p));
 }
 
-static bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *this_rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,
-				struct task_struct *p, struct rq *task_rq)
+static bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *p,
+				struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct rq *task_rq)
 {
 	raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq);
 
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ static bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *this_rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,
 }
 #else	/* CONFIG_SMP */
 static inline bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, bool trigger_error) { return false; }
-static inline bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq *task_rq) { return false; }
+static inline bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *p, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct rq *task_rq) { return false; }
 #endif	/* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 static bool consume_dispatch_q(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
@@ -2286,12 +2286,12 @@ static bool consume_dispatch_q(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
 		struct rq *task_rq = task_rq(p);
 
 		if (rq == task_rq) {
-			consume_local_task(rq, dsq, p);
+			consume_local_task(p, dsq, rq);
 			return true;
 		}
 
 		if (task_can_run_on_remote_rq(p, rq, false)) {
-			if (likely(consume_remote_task(rq, dsq, p, task_rq)))
+			if (likely(consume_remote_task(rq, p, dsq, task_rq)))
 				return true;
 			goto retry;
 		}
-- 
2.46.0