[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240831001538.336683-23-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 17:15:37 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...el.com>, Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 22/22] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN on MMIO cache hit when emulating
write-protected gfn
WARN if KVM gets an MMIO cache hit on a RET_PF_WRITE_PROTECTED fault, as
KVM should return RET_PF_WRITE_PROTECTED if and only if there is a memslot,
and creating a memslot is supposed to invalidate the MMIO cache by virtue
of changing the memslot generation.
Keep the code around mainly to provide a convenient location to document
why emulated MMIO should be impossible.
Suggested-by: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index be5c2c33b530..c9cea020aad6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5990,6 +5990,18 @@ static int kvm_mmu_write_protect_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
vcpu->arch.last_retry_eip = 0;
vcpu->arch.last_retry_addr = 0;
+ /*
+ * It should be impossible to reach this point with an MMIO cache hit,
+ * as RET_PF_WRITE_PROTECTED is returned if and only if there's a valid,
+ * writable memslot, and creating a memslot should invalidate the MMIO
+ * cache by way of changing the memslot generation. WARN and disallow
+ * retry if MMIO is detected, as retrying MMIO emulation is pointless
+ * and could put the vCPU into an infinite loop because the processor
+ * will keep faulting on the non-existent MMIO address.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(mmio_info_in_cache(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa, direct)))
+ return RET_PF_EMULATE;
+
/*
* Before emulating the instruction, check to see if the access was due
* to a read-only violation while the CPU was walking non-nested NPT
@@ -6031,17 +6043,15 @@ static int kvm_mmu_write_protect_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
return RET_PF_RETRY;
/*
- * The gfn is write-protected, but if emulation fails we can still
- * optimistically try to just unprotect the page and let the processor
+ * The gfn is write-protected, but if KVM detects its emulating an
+ * instruction that is unlikely to be used to modify page tables, or if
+ * emulation fails, KVM can try to unprotect the gfn and let the CPU
* re-execute the instruction that caused the page fault. Do not allow
- * retrying MMIO emulation, as it's not only pointless but could also
- * cause us to enter an infinite loop because the processor will keep
- * faulting on the non-existent MMIO address. Retrying an instruction
- * from a nested guest is also pointless and dangerous as we are only
- * explicitly shadowing L1's page tables, i.e. unprotecting something
- * for L1 isn't going to magically fix whatever issue cause L2 to fail.
+ * retrying an instruction from a nested guest as KVM is only explicitly
+ * shadowing L1's page tables, i.e. unprotecting something for L1 isn't
+ * going to magically fix whatever issue caused L2 to fail.
*/
- if (!mmio_info_in_cache(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa, direct) && !is_guest_mode(vcpu))
+ if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu))
*emulation_type |= EMULTYPE_ALLOW_RETRY_PF;
return RET_PF_EMULATE;
--
2.46.0.469.g59c65b2a67-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists