linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/12] sched_ext: Move sanity check and dsq_mod_nr() into task_unlink_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240901164417.779239-8-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Sun,  1 Sep 2024 06:43:44 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: void@...ifault.com
Cc: kernel-team@...a.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] sched_ext: Move sanity check and dsq_mod_nr() into task_unlink_from_dsq()

All task_unlink_from_dsq() users are doing dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1). Move it into
task_unlink_from_dsq(). Also move sanity check into it.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
---
 kernel/sched/ext.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 0829b7637c52..4ec0a4f7f3ee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1639,6 +1639,8 @@ static void dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p,
 static void task_unlink_from_dsq(struct task_struct *p,
 				 struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
 {
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node));
+
 	if (p->scx.dsq_flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) {
 		rb_erase(&p->scx.dsq_priq, &dsq->priq);
 		RB_CLEAR_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_priq);
@@ -1646,6 +1648,7 @@ static void task_unlink_from_dsq(struct task_struct *p,
 	}
 
 	list_del_init(&p->scx.dsq_list.node);
+	dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1);
 }
 
 static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
@@ -1682,9 +1685,7 @@ static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	*/
 	if (p->scx.holding_cpu < 0) {
 		/* @p must still be on @dsq, dequeue */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node));
 		task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
-		dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * We're racing against dispatch_to_local_dsq() which already
@@ -2146,7 +2147,6 @@ static void consume_local_task(struct task_struct *p,
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.holding_cpu >= 0);
 	task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
 	list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &rq->scx.local_dsq.list);
-	dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1);
 	dsq_mod_nr(&rq->scx.local_dsq, 1);
 	p->scx.dsq = &rq->scx.local_dsq;
 	raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
@@ -2236,7 +2236,6 @@ static bool unlink_dsq_and_lock_src_rq(struct task_struct *p,
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.holding_cpu >= 0);
 	task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
-	dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1);
 	p->scx.holding_cpu = cpu;
 
 	raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
-- 
2.46.0