lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtXjfB115MN22aQi@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 19:10:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] driver core: Ignore 0 in dev_err_probe()

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 05:58:18PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 11:25:54AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 04:05:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > In the similar way, ignore 0 error code (AKA "success") in
> > > dev_err_probe(). This helps to simplify a code such as
> > > 
> > >   if (ret < 0)
> > >     return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg);
> > > 
> > >   return ret;
> > > 
> > > to
> > > 
> > >   return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg);
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > This is a terrible idea because currently Smatch is able to detect about one
> > bug per month where someone unintentionally passes the wrong error variable
> > to dev_err_probe().
> > 
> > I really hate this.
> > 
> > NAKed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> 
> Regardless of any issues this may cause for tooling, I fully agree that
> this is a terrible idea that will only result in unreadable code.
> 
> 	return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "registration failed\n");
> 
> Except it did not fail...
> 
> NAK

Fair enough. Thank you, guys, for reviewing.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ