[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtVO9VDe-26jQFUK@google.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 05:36:53 +0000
From: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@...gle.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alexghiti@...osinc.com, ankita@...dia.com,
ardb@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, james.morse@....com,
vdonnefort@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
rananta@...gle.com, ryan.roberts@....com, shahuang@...hat.com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, will@...nel.org, yuzenghui@...wei.com,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] arm64: ptdump: Expose the attribute parsing
functionality
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 01:28:36PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 09:45:45 +0100,
> Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Reuse the descriptor parsing functionality to keep the same output format
> > as the original ptdump code.
Hello Mark,
>
> This sentence seems either out of place or missing something, because
> this change it not reusing anything...
>
> > In order for this to happen, move the state
> > tracking objects into a common header.
>
> ... but instead doing this ^^^.
>
> I propose to rewrite the commit message as:
>
> "Adding a new page-table dumper for stage-2 requires parsing the page
> tables, and reusing the descriptor parsing functionality would help
> keeping the same output format as the original ptdump code.
>
> In order for this to happen, move the state tracking object
> definitions into a common header."
Thanks for the feedback, I think the re-wording works much better and
I'll make use of it.
>
> Shout if you object to it!
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
Seb
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists