[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c60e167-7815-49c8-89f1-fe1139879d6b@web.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 08:00:46 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Gyeyoung Baek <gye976@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Remove duplicate code between labels
>>> Hello, I apologize for the insufficient explanation.
>>
>> How will the commit message be improved further?
…
> Since the code is short,
This implementation detail can be nice.
> I think it's fine for now.
Please reconsider such a view once more.
Are imperative wordings also more desirable for a better change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.11-rc6#n45
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists