[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtV66FOMJitMmtTv@apocalypse>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:44:24 +0200
From: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>,
Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add RaspberryPi RP1
gpio/pinctrl/pinmux bindings
Hi Krzysztof,
On 13:46 Fri 30 Aug , Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/08/2024 12:22, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
>
> ...
>
> >>> +#define RP1_USBHOST0_AXIS_BASE 0x200000
> >>> +#define RP1_USBHOST1_AXIS_BASE 0x300000
> >>> +#define RP1_EXAC_BASE 0x400000
> >>> +
> >>> +/* Interrupts */
> >>> +
> >>> +#define RP1_INT_IO_BANK0 0
> >>> +#define RP1_INT_IO_BANK1 1
> >>
> >> Also no, interrupt numbers are not considered bindings. That's too much
> >> churn. Otherwise, please point me to driver code using the define
> >> (directly! that's the requirement).
> >
> > As mentioned above, RP1_INT_END is used in rp1-pci.c. To get rid of all those
>
> Number of interrupts is not a binding, either. Does not appear in the DTS.
Ack.
>
> > macroes from dt-binding would mean to hardcode the interrupt number in both
> > the binding example and in dtso, from this:
> >
> > interrupts = <RP1_INT_IO_BANK0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > <RP1_INT_IO_BANK1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > <RP1_INT_IO_BANK2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >
> > to this:
> >
> > interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > <2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >
> > is this what you are proposing?
>
> Yes, just like every DTS does. I think the hard-coding of numbers is not
> a problem.
Ack.
Regards,
Andrea
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists