[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7d8fb47-c32e-4764-9c96-5d22cb278cb0@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 19:43:44 +0800
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@...e.com>, glass.su@...e.com
Cc: ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ocfs2: detect released suballocator bg for
fh_to_[dentry|parent]
On 7/29/24 4:04 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
> After ocfs2 has the ability to reclaim suballoc free bg, the
> suballocator block group may be released. This change makes xfstest
> case 426 failed.
>
> The existed code call stack:
>
> ocfs2_fh_to_dentry //or ocfs2_fh_to_parent
> ocfs2_get_dentry
> ocfs2_test_inode_bit
> ocfs2_test_suballoc_bit
> ocfs2_read_group_descriptor
> + read released bg, triggers validate fails, then cause -EROFS
>
> how to fix:
> The read bg failure is expectation, we should ignore this error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@...e.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> index 1b64f4c87607..dc421f55ed8f 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> @@ -3037,7 +3037,7 @@ static int ocfs2_test_suballoc_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
> struct ocfs2_group_desc *group;
> struct buffer_head *group_bh = NULL;
> u64 bg_blkno;
> - int status;
> + int status, quiet = 0;
>
> trace_ocfs2_test_suballoc_bit((unsigned long long)blkno,
> (unsigned int)bit);
> @@ -3053,11 +3053,16 @@ static int ocfs2_test_suballoc_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>
> bg_blkno = group_blkno ? group_blkno :
> ocfs2_which_suballoc_group(blkno, bit);
> - status = ocfs2_read_group_descriptor(suballoc, alloc_di, bg_blkno,
> + status = ocfs2_read_hint_group_descriptor(suballoc, alloc_di, bg_blkno,
> &group_bh);
> if (status < 0) {
> - mlog(ML_ERROR, "read group %llu failed %d\n",
> - (unsigned long long)bg_blkno, status);
> + if (status == -EIDRM) {
I don't think EIDRM is a proper error code in this case.
We can pass a output parameter or a flag to indicate a released one.
And please explicitly specify that this can be treated normally in
the related code logic of ocfs2_read_hint_group_descriptor().
Thanks,
Joseph
> + quiet = 1;
> + status = -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + mlog(ML_ERROR, "read group %llu failed %d\n",
> + (unsigned long long)bg_blkno, status);
> + }
> goto bail;
> }
>
> @@ -3067,7 +3072,7 @@ static int ocfs2_test_suballoc_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
> bail:
> brelse(group_bh);
>
> - if (status)
> + if (status && (!quiet))
> mlog_errno(status);
> return status;
> }
> @@ -3087,7 +3092,7 @@ static int ocfs2_test_suballoc_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
> */
> int ocfs2_test_inode_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb, u64 blkno, int *res)
> {
> - int status;
> + int status, quiet = 0;
> u64 group_blkno = 0;
> u16 suballoc_bit = 0, suballoc_slot = 0;
> struct inode *inode_alloc_inode;
> @@ -3129,8 +3134,12 @@ int ocfs2_test_inode_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb, u64 blkno, int *res)
>
> status = ocfs2_test_suballoc_bit(osb, inode_alloc_inode, alloc_bh,
> group_blkno, blkno, suballoc_bit, res);
> - if (status < 0)
> - mlog(ML_ERROR, "test suballoc bit failed %d\n", status);
> + if (status < 0) {
> + if (status == -EINVAL)
> + quiet = 1;
> + else
> + mlog(ML_ERROR, "test suballoc bit failed %d\n", status);
> + }
>
> ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode_alloc_inode, 0);
> inode_unlock(inode_alloc_inode);
> @@ -3138,7 +3147,7 @@ int ocfs2_test_inode_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb, u64 blkno, int *res)
> iput(inode_alloc_inode);
> brelse(alloc_bh);
> bail:
> - if (status)
> + if (status && !quiet)
> mlog_errno(status);
> return status;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists