linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add QPIC SPI NAND driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57a810e0-c072-7792-1f5f-3ddbeb0c97a3@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 19:52:25 +0530
From: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, <esben@...nix.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add QPIC SPI NAND driver



On 9/3/2024 7:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/09/2024 11:15, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> Hi Miquel,
>>
>> On 8/20/2024 4:12 PM, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>>> v8:
>>>    * Fixed compilation warning reported by kernel test robot
>>>    * Added "chip" description in nandc_set_read_loc_first()
>>>    * Added "chip" description" in nandc_set_read_loc_last()
>>>    * Changed data type of read_location0, read_location1,
>>>      read_location2, read_location3, addr0, addr1, cmd, cfg0,
>>>      cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg, ecc_buf_cfg, clrflashstatus, clrreadstatus,
>>>      orig_cmd1, orig_vld to __le32 to fix compilation warning.
>>>    * Included bitfield.h header file in spi-qpic-snand.c to
>>>      fix compilation warning
>>>    * Removed unused variable "steps" variable from
>>>      qcom_spi_ecc_init_ctx_pipelined()
>>>
>>       I have addressed your comments to v6 and further posted till v8.
>>       Could you please let me know if this is fine.
>>       and how to get this merged ?
> 
> Two weeks ago you received reports that your code does not build
> properly. So no, it is not fine. Please respond to the reports and/or
> send corrected code.
   Sorry I missed it, will fix and post next revision.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>