lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEivzxd_a-HbiajyxmeyUR7g4EFQJym6XWt_S67eKR5C1fMc6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 17:22:40 +0200
From: Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, mszeredi@...hat.com, stgraber@...raber.org, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>, 
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] fs/fuse: add FUSE_OWNER_UID_GID_EXT extension

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 3:49 PM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 12:57, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 08:58:55PM GMT, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 at 19:41, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
> > > <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Let's think about it a bit more and if you confirm that we want to go
> > > > this way, then I'll rework my patches.
> > >
> > > And ACK from Christian would be good.
> >
> > Yeah, that all sounds good to me. I think Alex just followed the
> > cephfs precedent.
>
> Okay, so please drop this patchset from your tree, then I'll have a
> chance to review when Alex resends it.

Dear friends,

v4 is ready https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240903151626.264609-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com
and tested with virtiofsd:

# ./check -g idmapped
FSTYP         -- virtiofs
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 ubuntu 6.11.0-rc6+ #21 SMP
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Sep  3 16:48:58 CEST 2024

generic/633 1s ...  1s
generic/644 0s ...  0s
generic/645 19s ...  18s
generic/656 1s ...  1s
generic/689 0s ...  0s
generic/696       [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/697 0s ...  0s
generic/698       [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/699       [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
Ran: generic/633 generic/644 generic/645 generic/656 generic/689
generic/696 generic/697 generic/698 generic/699
Not run: generic/696 generic/698 generic/699
Passed all 9 tests

Kind regards,
Alex

>
> Thanks,
> Miklos

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ