[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240903154755.3460442-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 18:47:55 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: baytrail: Drop duplicate return statement
No need to repeat 'return ret;' inside and outside conditional.
Just use one outside conditional for both cases.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
index 6dab0316715b..ad6a5e7157ee 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
@@ -1535,10 +1535,8 @@ static int byt_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *vg)
}
ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(vg->dev, gc, vg);
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret)
dev_err(vg->dev, "failed adding byt-gpio chip\n");
- return ret;
- }
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac
Powered by blists - more mailing lists