[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87frqgu2t0.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 18:20:27 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Tian
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, Yiwei Zhang <zzyiwei@...gle.com>, Lai Jiangshan
<jiangshanlai@...il.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Josh
Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: VMX: Always honor guest PAT on CPUs that
support self-snoop
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> FWIW, I use QEMU-9.0 from the same C10S (qemu-kvm-9.0.0-7.el10.x86_64)
>> but I don't think it matters in this case. My CPU is "Intel(R) Xeon(R)
>> Silver 4410Y".
>
> Has this been reproduced on any other hardware besides SPR? I.e. did we stumble
> on another hardware issue?
Very possible, as according to Yan Zhao this doesn't reproduce on at
least "Coffee Lake-S". Let me try to grab some random hardware around
and I'll be back with my observations.
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists