lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ac2dfbf-fd9a-4223-8d9e-bb41dbf98b1a@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:29:23 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
 "open list : PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
 open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "open list : USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
 Daniel Drake <drake@...lessos.org>, Gary Li <Gary.Li@....com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] PCI: Check PCI_PM_CTRL instead of PCI_COMMAND in
 pci_dev_wait()

On 8/29/2024 19:01, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:40:20AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>>
>> If a dock is plugged in at the same time as autosuspend delay then
>> this can cause malfunctions in the USB4 stack. This happens because
>> the device is still in D3cold at the time that the PCI core handed
>> control back to the USB4 stack.
>>
>> A device that has gone through a reset may return a value in
>> PCI_COMMAND but that doesn't mean it's finished transitioning to D0.
>> For devices that support power management explicitly check
>> PCI_PM_CTRL on everything but system resume to ensure the transition
>> happened.
> 
> Still trying to understand what's going on here.
> 
> I posted a change to pci_dev_wait() to read Vendor ID, look for Config
> RRS status, and wait for a successful completion (when RRS Software
> Visibility is enabled) [1].
> 
> You tested that and found that it didn't help with *this* issue [2].
> I assume you tested something like v6.11-rc plus the patches from [1],
> i.e., without the PCI_PM_CTRL changes in this series.
> 
>    1) Initially the device is in D0
> 
>    2) We put it in D3cold (using some ACPI method) because the
>    autosuspend delay expired (?)
> 
>    3) Plugging in the dock wakes up the device, so we power up the
>    device (via pci_power_up(), which again uses some ACPI method), and
>    it should transition to D0uninitialized
> 
>    4) The USB4 stack sees the device but thinks it's in D3cold (?)
> 
> If your testing only included [1], but did not include the
> pci_power_up() change from patch 3/5 "Verify functions currently in
> D3cold have entered D0", I don't think we would call pci_dev_wait(),
> so I wouldn't expect [1] to make any difference.
> 
> If you *did* include both [1] and patch 3/5, the implication would be
> that pci_dev_wait() successfully read the Vendor ID, meaning the
> device is not in D3cold when pci_power_up() returns.

The testing here was from the LTS 6.6.y kernel with both [1] and patch 
3/5 from this series.

I can get testing from 6.11-rc6 with a combination of patches if you 
would like.

> 
> Can you clarify what you see and possibly expand/correct my timeline
> above?

The timeline you shared is nearly correct.  The USB4 stack *thinks* the 
device is in D0 because of the return of pci_power_up().

As by polling PCI_PM_CTRL we can see it's still in D3, so it hasn't made 
it to D0uninitialized yet.

I guess I reading between the lines you have an assumption that you 
can't read the vendor ID from D3; which doesn't appear to be the case 
from our testing.

> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240827234848.4429-1-helgaas@kernel.org/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/30d9589a-8050-421b-a9a5-ad3422feadad@amd.com/
> 
>> Devices that don't support power management and system resume will
>> continue to use PCI_COMMAND.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>> ---
>> v4->v5:
>>   * Fix misleading indentation
>>   * Amend commit message
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/pci.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index 1e219057a5069..f032a4aaec268 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -1309,21 +1309,33 @@ static int pci_dev_wait(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_reset_type reset_type, int
>>   	 * the read (except when CRS SV is enabled and the read was for the
>>   	 * Vendor ID; in that case it synthesizes 0x0001 data).
>>   	 *
>> -	 * Wait for the device to return a non-CRS completion.  Read the
>> -	 * Command register instead of Vendor ID so we don't have to
>> -	 * contend with the CRS SV value.
>> +	 * Wait for the device to return a non-CRS completion.  On devices
>> +	 * that support PM control and on waits that aren't part of system
>> +	 * resume read the PM control register to ensure the device has
>> +	 * transitioned to D0.  On devices that don't support PM control,
>> +	 * or during system resume read the command register to instead of
>> +	 * Vendor ID so we don't have to contend with the CRS SV value.
>>   	 */
>>   	for (;;) {
>> -		u32 id;
>> -
>>   		if (pci_dev_is_disconnected(dev)) {
>>   			pci_dbg(dev, "disconnected; not waiting\n");
>>   			return -ENOTTY;
>>   		}
>>   
>> -		pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &id);
>> -		if (!PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(id))
>> -			break;
>> +		if (dev->pm_cap && reset_type != PCI_DEV_WAIT_RESUME) {
>> +			u16 pmcsr;
>> +
>> +			pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcsr);
>> +			if (!PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(pmcsr) &&
>> +			    (pmcsr & PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK) == PCI_D0)
>> +				break;
>> +		} else {
>> +			u32 id;
>> +
>> +			pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &id);
>> +			if (!PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(id))
>> +				break;
>> +		}
>>   
>>   		if (delay > timeout) {
>>   			pci_warn(dev, "not ready %dms after %s; giving up\n",
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ