[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtduQeu2NNyVWTk7@aschofie-mobl2.lan>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 13:14:57 -0700
From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
To: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/region: Fix logic for finding a free cxl decoder
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 08:41:44PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>
> match_free_decoder()'s logic for finding a free cxl decoder depends on
> a prerequisite that all child decoders are sorted by ID in ascending order
> but the prerequisite may not be guaranteed, fix by finding a free cxl
> decoder with minimal ID.
After reading the 'Closes' tag below I have a better understanding of
why you may be doing this, but I don't want to have to jump to that
Link. Can you describe here examples of when the ordered allocation
may not be guaranteed, and the impact when that happens.
This includes a change to device_for_each_child() which I see mentioned
in the Closes tag discussion too. Is that required for this fix?
It's feeling like the fix and api update are comingled. Please clarify.
Thanks,
Alison
>
> Fixes: 384e624bb211 ("cxl/region: Attach endpoint decoders")
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cdfc6f98-1aa0-4cb5-bd7d-93256552c39b@icloud.com/
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 21ad5f242875..b9607b4fc40b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -797,21 +797,26 @@ static size_t show_targetN(struct cxl_region *cxlr, char *buf, int pos)
> static int match_free_decoder(struct device *dev, void *data)
> {
> struct cxl_decoder *cxld;
> - int *id = data;
> + struct cxl_decoder *target_cxld;
> + struct device **target_device = data;
>
> if (!is_switch_decoder(dev))
> return 0;
>
> cxld = to_cxl_decoder(dev);
> -
> - /* enforce ordered allocation */
> - if (cxld->id != *id)
> + if (cxld->region)
> return 0;
>
> - if (!cxld->region)
> - return 1;
> -
> - (*id)++;
> + if (!*target_device) {
> + *target_device = get_device(dev);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + /* enforce ordered allocation */
> + target_cxld = to_cxl_decoder(*target_device);
> + if (cxld->id < target_cxld->id) {
> + put_device(*target_device);
> + *target_device = get_device(dev);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -839,8 +844,7 @@ cxl_region_find_decoder(struct cxl_port *port,
> struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled,
> struct cxl_region *cxlr)
> {
> - struct device *dev;
> - int id = 0;
> + struct device *dev = NULL;
>
> if (port == cxled_to_port(cxled))
> return &cxled->cxld;
> @@ -849,7 +853,8 @@ cxl_region_find_decoder(struct cxl_port *port,
> dev = device_find_child(&port->dev, &cxlr->params,
> match_auto_decoder);
> else
> - dev = device_find_child(&port->dev, &id, match_free_decoder);
> + /* Need to put_device(@dev) after use */
> + device_for_each_child(&port->dev, &dev, match_free_decoder);
> if (!dev)
> return NULL;
> /*
>
> ---
> base-commit: 67784a74e258a467225f0e68335df77acd67b7ab
> change-id: 20240903-fix_cxld-4f6575a90619
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists