linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Inline intel_gpio_community_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240903045457.GX1532424@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 07:54:57 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Inline
 intel_gpio_community_irq_handler()

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 05:14:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Since we have for_each_intel_pad_group() helper, there is
> no advantage of having intel_gpio_community_irq_handler().
> Inline it into intel_gpio_irq().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>