[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877cbso2y6.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:13:53 -0700
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
arnd@...db.de, lenb@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
harisokn@...zon.com, mtosatti@...hat.com, sudeep.holla@....com,
cl@...two.org, misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com, maobibo@...ngson.cn,
joao.m.martins@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/10] arm64: define TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 03:28:41PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
>>
>> Commit 842514849a61 ("arm64: Remove TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG") had removed
>> TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG because arm64 only supported non-polled idling via
>> cpu_do_idle().
>>
>> To add support for polling via cpuidle-haltpoll, we want to use the
>> standard poll_idle() interface, which sets TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG while
>> polling.
>>
>> Reuse the same bit to define TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Thanks!
--
ankur
Powered by blists - more mailing lists