[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ztaf4PbPNxeMIg7J@tlindgre-MOBL1>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 08:34:24 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
"sean.j.christopherson@...el.com" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
"isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/25] KVM: TDX: Do TDX specific vcpu initialization
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 02:34:21PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-08-12 at 15:48 -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> > +static inline bool is_td_vcpu_created(struct vcpu_tdx *tdx)
> > +{
> > + return tdx->td_vcpu_created;
> > +}
>
> This and is_td_finalized() seem like unneeded helpers. The field name is clear
> enough.
I'll do a patch for this.
> > static inline bool is_td_created(struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx)
> > {
> > return kvm_tdx->tdr_pa;
>
> Not this one though, the helper makes the caller code clearer.
Yes this makes things more readable.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists